Your honor, the plaintiff has spoken out of turn. If he gets to bring an argument up without being addressed, I;m going to reply to that argument.
How are they not witnesses? They clearly witnessed the incident as they were at the location of it..?
However, you clearly had intent to do this, which can also be proven by your persistence to treat players even though it is now illegal.definition of treat - give medical care or attention to; try to heal or cure. None of the witnesses or _CranberrySprite were sick therefor I can't treat them.
Yes, as you had initially dropped the lawsuit, therefore I didn't need to reach out to Catch for evidence in this case._CranberrySprite asked for the interpretation of "treat" many weeks after the incident but I asked
Interesting. So if I dislocate bh's shoulder and Lib fixes it (with no prior medical education) she doesn't treat it? I would also like to re-introduce the point (which you've completely ignored) that that was HER interpretation of the law, not our's. While yes she is a Police Officer, the law for which we punished you for was ambivalent, and thus open to multiple interpretations. Three police officers appeared to agree on one interpretation of the law, leading us to punish you.puppy_lover153 a day or two after the incident and she said in order to treat someone I would have to be a Doctor.
The crime however, does exist to some interpretations. And the three police officers online at the time agreed to that interpretation. However, again, it is not YOUR job to interpret it. It was YOUR decision to sit around and argue with us instead of taking an insignificant fine. It was YOUR decision to repeatedly pay back the reimbursement (so therefore we didn't really fine him at all, as he was reimbursed).RedFr0st you are calling upon the other two who falsely fined me and they are not witnesses to anything other than them fining me for a crime that did not exist.
How are they not witnesses? They clearly witnessed the incident as they were at the location of it..?