Lawsuit: In Session Lentark_ v. Department of Justice

[Lentark_]

In The Supreme Court of The Stratham Republic
CIVIL ACTION
Date: 05/06/25
(Lentark_)

v.

(Department of Justice)

I. Description of Case

The plaintiff alleges that they were assaulted by a nuclear device which paused a business transaction, gave them a debilitating illness, high medical costs and emotional trauma as a result of an extremely poorly managed suppression of peaceful protest at the capital. Protestors were simply exercising their right to free speech which I myself was nowhere near being a part of and suffered this horrifying bodily harm from a far distance.

II. Parties

1. Lentark_
2. Department of Justice
3. pet_the_rat
4. Protestors

III. Sequence of Events
1. Tuesday May 5th 2025 @ 11:45 PST | A nuclear bomb is suddenly dropped on the entire city of Stratham in response to a couple of protestors at the capital by the DoJ.

IV. Claims for Relief

1. Initiating unwanted PvP in a city/town is illegal unless both parties give consent;
2. 3 or more counts of:
   (1) Define Murder as “The act of killing another player without the victimized party giving consent to the murder”(a) Outlaw Murder
   (b) This act shall receive the punishment of a Class 1 Misdemeanor.
3. Murder of innocent civilians
4. Murder of government official
5. This case has brought uneccessary attention to my name and I am now posed with this unwarranted publicity and trauma
   4.1(a) Players will have the right to privacy and to be free from unwarranted publicity. This right shall not apply to holders of public office or in any other position in which they are empowered with public trust.
6. The DoJ is responsible for upholding this mission below, but failed to maintain peace and order, and violated criminal laws.
   1.1(j) Department of Justice (DoJ):
   1. Maintaining Peace and Order.
   2. Enforcement of Criminal Laws.
   3. Providing a Security Detail to the Prime Minister and Deputy Prime Minister.
   4. May provide a Security Detail to other Senior Government Officials if directed to do so by the Prime Minister.

V. Damages

1. 15.5 kr medical bill coverage for treatment
2. 5,000 kr emotional damages and bodily harm
3. 5,000 kr for privacy violations and unwanted publicity
4. 500 kr failed business transaction during event

(Attach evidence and a list of witnesses at the bottom if applicable)

Witnesses:
Aliclya
Shac8

In advancing this form to the court, you acknowledge and concur with the rules of court which highlight the importance of honesty at all times. Moreover, you understand the punishments for breaking these rules and/or committing perjury and deception in the court.

 

[Cherub54321]

@pet_the_fish is hereby summoned to the court to acknowledge the case. If the Defendant, @pet_the_fish , does not acknowledge the case as a reply in 2 days, the case will close in the Plaintiff's favor.

Court is in Session

This case is presided by Judge Cherub54321 Bear in mind to not reply to court cases unless summoned by the Judge!

 

[Cherub54321]

This case is now being reviewed in game, the results of which shall be posted here

 

[Cherub54321]

Good Evening,

The completed transcript for the in game session is now completed and attached. I request that both parties review this and confirm here that the transcription is a complete and true representation of what happened in game. Following confirmations, we shall move on to the third witness statement.

 

[Lentark_]

Looks good to me.

 

[pet_the_fish]

CONFIRMED YIPPIE !!!!!!

 

[Cherub54321]

Good Evening,

I would like to remind all parties that this is a court of law, and I expect your behaviour to reflect as such. Failure to do so may result in you being charged with contempt of court. Moving forwards, @ELITE_ASSASSIN19 is hereby called to this court to give evidence as a witness, and are requested to announce their presence within this court with a simple present.

Once the witness has announced their presence, the Defence may begin their examination of the witness. Once the defence has no further questions, they are to state so. If at any point, the plaintiff has an objection to any question asked or response given, they are to raise it immediately, following which I shall make a decision on said objection.

 

[ELITE_ASSASSIN19]

Report for duty

 

[pet_the_fish]

May the witnesses answer these questions.

Are you a member of the justice department

At the time of the initial alarm were you online

When the internal alarm was raised , what actions did you take

For a riot to be effectively controlled, do you believe there is a minimum number of officers required, and if so how many

If there is a minimum at the time of the alert was there sufficient police power

And finally in order for the department to control the riot with the limited officers we had at the time, was it necessary for us to use nuclear force

 

[ELITE_ASSASSIN19]

1. So yes I am a member of the Justice department I am a captain/ dep minister
2.No I came on when the Alert was put into discord
3.When the alarm was raised. I went straight to the capital And was following orders to secure the capital
4. Yes I believe a maximum of 5 officers on is Enough to control the riot
5.i feel the minister Made The decision which limited time and officers on