pet_the_fish
Shush I'm busy with school D:
Minister of Justice
Department of Internal Development
Lawyer
Donator
pet_the_rat
Justice Minister
In The District Court of The Stratham Republic
CIVIL ACTION
Date: 03/30/2024
pet_the_fish
v.
The Department of Justice
I. Description of Case
The plaintiff pet_the_fish was drinking on his mansion plot in northeast capital. During this time DoJ officers spyrolix and Tumblecritter picked up on the fact that PeachLemon_ and I were intoxicated. Having noticed this they preceded to warn us for being publicly intoxicated. Now under Section 4 definition 19 of of the Criminal Reform V.2 Act of December 2023, you can only be charged for being publicly intoxicated if you are not on private property. However, spyrolix and Tummblecritter preceded to trespass on my property, 06-Shallow-Ln, to arrest me for public intoxication, when we had never left the property during the period of drinking. I was further taken to the police station and charged 100kr.
II. Parties
1. pet_the_fish
2. PeachLemon_
3. spyrolix
4. Tummblecritter
III. Sequence of Events
1. I collected alcohol from my second home
2. I headed over to my mansion with PeachLemon_
3. We preceded to consume the alcohol
4. We wondered around my property while conversing
5. We were warned by spyrolix
6. We continued what we were doing as we were on my property
7. spyrolix and Tummblecritter turned up at the plot
8. Tummblecritter handcuffed me
9. PeachLemon_ killed Tummblecritter for trespassing
10. I was taken to the police station and charged
IV. Claims for Relief
1. Section 4, definition 19 of the Criminal Reform V.2 Act states:
(19) Define Public Intoxication as “The act of disturbing the public or a specific player by slurred speech or throwing up or by exceeding the legal limit for intoxication.”
(a) This law shall not apply to players that are drunk on their own property or on another player’s property with permission from the owner.
(b) Outlaw Public Intoxication.
(c) The Department of Justice shall be the authority of enforcement of this illegal act.
(d) The legal limit of intoxication shall be 4% alcohol content.
V. Damages
1. The fine of 100kr paid back to pet_the_fish
2. The conviction removed from my record
3. Compensation of 1000kr for the affected parties pet_the_fish and PeachLemon_
4. 500kr in legal fees
VI. Evidence
Witness: PeachLemon_
Evidence:
Lawyer Qualification:
In advancing this form to the court, you acknowledge and concur with the rules of court which highlight the importance of honesty at all times. Moreover, you understand the punishments for breaking these rules and/or committing perjury and deception in the court.
CIVIL ACTION
Date: 03/30/2024
pet_the_fish
v.
The Department of Justice
I. Description of Case
The plaintiff pet_the_fish was drinking on his mansion plot in northeast capital. During this time DoJ officers spyrolix and Tumblecritter picked up on the fact that PeachLemon_ and I were intoxicated. Having noticed this they preceded to warn us for being publicly intoxicated. Now under Section 4 definition 19 of of the Criminal Reform V.2 Act of December 2023, you can only be charged for being publicly intoxicated if you are not on private property. However, spyrolix and Tummblecritter preceded to trespass on my property, 06-Shallow-Ln, to arrest me for public intoxication, when we had never left the property during the period of drinking. I was further taken to the police station and charged 100kr.
II. Parties
1. pet_the_fish
2. PeachLemon_
3. spyrolix
4. Tummblecritter
III. Sequence of Events
1. I collected alcohol from my second home
2. I headed over to my mansion with PeachLemon_
3. We preceded to consume the alcohol
4. We wondered around my property while conversing
5. We were warned by spyrolix
6. We continued what we were doing as we were on my property
7. spyrolix and Tummblecritter turned up at the plot
8. Tummblecritter handcuffed me
9. PeachLemon_ killed Tummblecritter for trespassing
10. I was taken to the police station and charged
IV. Claims for Relief
1. Section 4, definition 19 of the Criminal Reform V.2 Act states:
(19) Define Public Intoxication as “The act of disturbing the public or a specific player by slurred speech or throwing up or by exceeding the legal limit for intoxication.”
(a) This law shall not apply to players that are drunk on their own property or on another player’s property with permission from the owner.
(b) Outlaw Public Intoxication.
(c) The Department of Justice shall be the authority of enforcement of this illegal act.
(d) The legal limit of intoxication shall be 4% alcohol content.
V. Damages
1. The fine of 100kr paid back to pet_the_fish
2. The conviction removed from my record
3. Compensation of 1000kr for the affected parties pet_the_fish and PeachLemon_
4. 500kr in legal fees
VI. Evidence
Witness: PeachLemon_
Evidence:
Lawyer Qualification:
In advancing this form to the court, you acknowledge and concur with the rules of court which highlight the importance of honesty at all times. Moreover, you understand the punishments for breaking these rules and/or committing perjury and deception in the court.
